Apr 08

Structural Moving’s impressive and practical ‘State-of-the-Art’, is matched, sadly, by society’s (peoples’) state of assumptions and limitations regarding the technical capabilities.

Unfortunately, this limits society’s ability to both comprehend the ‘issues’ and our responses to them.

*

CDS Building Movers provides a particularly insightful example – for it’s social ‘assumptions’ as well as real technical capabilities. The ’special project’ featured on their website involved the moving of five historic buildings from the campus of Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario (1992).

This is a valuable learning resource.

Firstly, as the title states: ‘They said it couldn’t be done’. That is the common refrain. Most people don’t know what is possible, technically. Structural Moving is simply ‘off the radar’ of the general population. It is assumed that structures must remain ‘in place’, or be demolished … the thought of lifting/moving is, sadly, beyond peoples’ comprehension.

Even in this example at Queen’s University … where were the academic engineers and architects when it was assumed that the buildings must be demolished? Here, a university of ‘higher education’ is unable to determine the capabilities and possibilities – isn’t that (partly) what the education system exists for?

Yet, of course it ‘could be done’. It is possible to lift/move large heavy structures – as I’ve written about in previous articles, we’ve been capable of such technical marvels for ages. It ‘could’ve been done’ thousands of years ago. Aren’t the wonders of human technical capabilities a part of Queen’s University history courses?

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Mar 11

Emergent patters/properties of complex adaptive systems are achieved through simple operating ‘rules’.

Indeed, simple ‘rules’ are a necessity of complex dynamical interactions. A common misunderstanding is that the complex interactions are a result of complex ‘rules’.

Emergent properties may be thought of as ’simplicities’ in the sense that they are the identifiable ‘things’ … whether properties (structural behaviour), patterns (of birds in flight, schoals of birds), or ‘problems’ … which result from the complex interactions of the dynamical system.

While the interactions of the system are complex, the rules which lead to the system’s behaviour are ’simple’. This is one of many counterintuitive aspects of complex adaptive systems.

‘Life’ provides the best and most obvious example.

Applying the lessons learned from the ‘rules of Life’, to the design of Communities (and resulting social lifestyles) is a high form of Biomimicry. The notion of having a few simple rules by which to design and construct healthy vibrant communities of immense diversity and resilience is confirmed by Life.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Mar 03

Our  ’problems’, as emergent properties of complex adaptive (fractal) systems are (in certain cases) fractal ‘patterns’ on various scales of our eco/socio-economic system.

So, too, solutions can be fractal: an effective re-build of a system structure at one level can/will be result in solutions as emergent properties on various scales.

Communities … rebuilding the structure form of existing subdivisions, by design, to be real, integral communities … will lead to multi-scalar emergent solutions.

Indeed, an immediate ‘emergent solution’ of Urban Transformation as a new industry (industrial system) is the economic stimulus effect in terms of the innovative commercial/industrial investments and operations.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Mar 01

Complex Adaptive Systems are also known as Fractal Systems, in regards to their ’scale-independent’ or ‘fractal’ structure.

The fractal characteristic (or scale-independence) of Complex Adaptive Systems is that features of the whole are present in each of the component parts … this is also known as ’self-similarity’ … patterns that repeat at different scales.

Our ‘problems’ are (in certain cases) fractal ‘patterns’ on various scales of our eco/socio-economic system. So, too, solutions can be fractal: an effective re-build of a system structure at one level can/will be a solution on various scales.

Urban Transformation is the practical application of this principle: the improper design of the existing residential subdivisions in a primary component of many integrated multi-scalar (fractal) ‘problems’ … we can transform the existing residential subdivisions into real Communities, by design, with solutions as emergent properties on various scales.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 25

Developing a new understanding is a new mindset … a non-reversible neural systemic change.

Specifically, understanding Urban Transformation … the need for structural re-building of our physical communities, and the practical capabilities to do so … is a systemic change to a new mindset of possibilities.

*

It is by learning a sufficient amount and variety of component ‘pieces’ of information, and their interconnections …. attaining the appropriate ‘critical mass(es)’ of learning, in a critically appropriate (short) period of time … that the systemic change of mindset or ‘understanding’ is achieved.

Likewise, in turn, when a sufficient number and variety of people … the ‘critical mass(es)’ of people … develop a new understanding – and, in a critically short period of time, a new widespread social paradigm can be achieved.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 22

The structure of our residential subdivisions presents enormous potential for beneficial change.

To truly appreciate the potential for achieving systemic change … and, the potential for vast improvements, it is necessary to understand the underlying factors of our existing problematic residential ‘form’. In particular, the roads: the arterial avenues/roads, and, the ‘inner’ residential roads.

I’m focussing on roads as a primary ‘component’ because it represents a defining feature of the landscape – delineating the resultant land area that is ‘left over’ for all other uses; roads are a very high cost feature (initial construction, maintenance and repair); and, as a consequence of ‘form’, virtually all aspects of life both involve and impact roads.

In terms of systems, roads serve as a ‘boundary conditions’.

Yet, the roads are also serve as linear ‘centres’ of commerce and industry.

These are two conflicting functions, and as I believe, the source of much of our social, transportation, traffic congestion ‘problems’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 16

Transforming our subdivisions into viable integrated Communities, by design, represents a vital ‘Leverage Point’ for greater systemic non-reversible change to a sustainable society.

***

The physical structure or form of a system is a critical factor in it’s functioning … whether the functioning is effective/efficient, or problematic.

And, problematic is what we currently have … ecological, social and economic.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 15

Communities are a systemic ‘whole’ on a small (local) scale, while also larger-scale ‘component wholes’ … of our greater socio-economic system(s).

It is this ‘duality’ – in a fractal sense – that presents an opportunity of enormous potential.

Communities represent a key ‘leverage point’ …  as a means of establishing large-scale beneficial systemic change.

In fact, this is a uniquely vital ‘Dual Leverage Point’: as an ‘end’ goal of resolving many practical ‘issues’ for local residents (a means of improving their lifestyles); and, on a greater social scale, the improvements of local behavioural interactions serves as a means of establishing large-scale transitional systemic socio-economic changes.

*

*

Our problematic situations are systemic, and many eco/socio-economic ‘issues’ are a result of the form of our existing residential subdivisions.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 10

Systemic non-reversible solutions are needed to ‘resolve’ our problematic situations.

A real resolution of our problematic situation(s) implies ‘change’ … a transitional change … and, permanent change: In systems science, this is referred to as a ‘non-reversible’ systemic change.

After all, it’d do no good to change ‘for the better’, only for the system to revert back to the same (or similar) problematic situation.

This is a true transformation – transforming the ‘whole’ system to achieve a ‘non-reversible’ resolution to the problematic situation(s).

Understanding systems and requires great effort to learn: there are various types of systems, each with many ‘aspects’ or component parts, and interconnections; there is the issue of ’scale’ and ’scope’ (scale of breadth and depth).

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 09

Complex Adaptive Systems involve a multitude of interactions/interconnections among numerous component parts in which ‘control’ is highly decentralized, and the coherent behaviour (patterns) arising from the interactions (competitive, cooperative) between the ‘agents’, which are capable of changing and ‘learning’ – adaptive.

Both ecological and social systems are complex adaptive systems, and even more so together in a greater eco/soci-economic system: we are dependent on ecological systems for our lives (air, water, nutrients, etc.), and, our actions in turn affect ecosystems. Furthermore, our socio-economic systems depend entirely on the inputs of ecological resources as ‘factors’ of productions (and ’sinks’ for our waste by-products).

Moreover, the problematic eco/socio-economic situations are complex adaptive systems.

So, if we’re to truly resolve our eco/social ‘problems’ we can do so only with a systems mindset – by resolving the complex adaptive system ‘as a whole’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 08

‘System’ … this is a very broad term, and includes many categories, types, etc. There are various definitions of systems.

In fact, even amongst the experts, there is no single classification for all types of systems, or for all purposes of analyses.

My intent with this article is not to provide a ’specific’ definition or even to describe ‘what’ systems … rather, my goal here is to help you, dear reader, to learn and develop an understanding of systems (prompting further study), and ultimately to ‘think’ in terms of systems with a ’systems mindset’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 03

From a distance, a community would have a ‘dimensional’ look to it – similar to a city with it’s downtown core.

So, there’d be a sense of Place, both from afar and within. The community core would be visually evident and obvious, so that with a glance from a distance even a visitor could easily/immediately locate the centre.

A self-contained community, then, can be thought of as a fractal structure – in which, the features of the whole are represented in each of the various scaled components. Community; district; city; region … are (ought to be) representative ‘wholes’ of increasing scale. This will be a topic of further discussion in a following article.

This ’self-similarity’ or, ’scale-independence’ is a fundamental aspect of dynamical, complex adaptive systems … a (successful) feature of nature; a replicable model … so, why then aren’t we adopting/adapting natures successes?! This is an aspect of Biomimicry that deserves serious attention.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 01

Complex Systems involve a multiplicity of components and connections.

A vibrant Community, being a complex system, is comprised of a multiplicity (amount and variety) of components and connections.

In the previous blog articles, ‘Systems Approach to Solutions’ (Parts 1 & 2), I briefly described the nature of systems, especially complex systems, and the ’systems approach’ to designing meaningful solutions.

Our ecological and socio-economic ‘issues’ are truly complex, involving many interconnected component aspects.

In the subdivisions of our urban/suburban societies, our lifestyle behaviours represent a primary component of our problematic situation(s): our auto-dependent … highly mobile, yet also highly sedentary lifestyles and excessive processed food result in many health ‘issues’; energy-intensity (electricity; petro; etc.) causes ecological/economic impacts; and on …

Our lifestyles, though, are ‘pre-determined’ in the sense that we’re constrained by the physical form of the built-environment in which we live … so many (most) of us live in subdivisions (inner suburban sprawl of a previous generation; new suburbs); and, the suburbs are so similar.

So, residential subdivisions as a physical ‘form’ are a major component of our problematic situations, imposing major negative ecological, social and economic impacts.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 28

A community system, specifically a complex adaptive system is comprised of a multitude of components and (inter)connections.

So a real community – as a complex adaptive system – requires the necessary critical mass of components and connections.

Actually, we could think in terms of the main ‘component’ sub-systems: physical infrastructural system; social system; and, the greater ecological/environmental system.

Scale and scope … of the subsystems and their components and connections. In fact, scale and scope of each of the ’scales’ and ’scopes’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 26

Consider, from a ’systems mindset’, that our problematic situations are systemic: a consequent result of the various components and their interactions that comprise the ‘whole’ system.

Without a sufficient understanding (in breadth and depth) of the system as a whole, we cannot alter or change any ‘one’ component and expect a drastic beneficial result … even a drastic change to a single component will not necessarily fundamentally alter the whole … it may, but not necessarily; even changes to two or more components, individually or independently, is likely insufficient to achieve fundamental system change.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 25

A sustainable resilient society is essential.

To achieve this sustainability, our many ecological/environmental and social ‘issues’ must be resolved.

Our eco/social ‘issues’ are interconnected and interdependent … this is the realm of complex, dynamic systems: resultant ‘wholes’ comprised of a variety of component ‘parts’ which have a variety of interconnections/interdependence.

So, our eco/social ‘issues’ must be understood as a ‘whole’.

To achieve a lasting beneficial change toward a sustainable resilient society, requires a ’systemic change’ … specifically, a ‘non-reversible’ systemic transitional change. For systemic change, the system ‘as a  whole’ must be addressed.

A ’systems approach’ … with a ’systems mindset’ … is a prerequisite to truly resolving our problematic situations.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 08

Our shared needs are a result of the ‘built form’ of our cities/towns/neighbourhoods … so, our ultimate shared need is to change the ‘built form’ … to transform.

Some examples of shared problematic situations and their corresponding goals, include:

* traffic congestion … goal: to reduce auto dependency, use; improve traffic flow
* local provision of basics (food) … need to promote/support local merchants
* pedestrian access and infrastructure … need more pedestrian ‘ways’
*
* excessive impermeable surfaces (asphalt, concrete) … need more green/natural/open space
* disconnected parks … need to connect into network
* lack of biodiversity … need to increase natural spaces and indigenous species
*
* health (obesity, etc.) … need to increase physical activity in ‘daily living’ (walking, etc.)
* intergenerational interaction … need places/spaces for all people to frequent

This list could grow very long, as there are many more issues/ and they are very real needs: ecological, social, personal. And affect people in various ways, directly and indirectly.

No one ‘issue’ may seem overly significant … but it’s the totality over the course of each and every day, of the various ‘component needs’, and combinations of these ‘needs’ that adds up to effect our individual lives and the health/well-being of our relationships and society as a whole.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 07

The people in any particular neighbourhood share in the physical space; share the amenities (libraries; schools; etc.) and infrastructure (roads; … ).

The neighbours of any given ‘place’ live their lives together, whether or not they think of it as such. Next door neighbours may live within a few ‘feet’ (meter) in adjacent houses (or, in contact, as with townhouses). To me, just as ‘room-mates’ live together, people ‘live together’ on a larger scale as ‘community-mates’.

That’s not to say everyone needs to be buddies with each other. Rather, a simple basic respect is the fundamental need.

People also share in the social dynamic. For instance, if two neighbours feud, then the other people in the immediate vicinity are drawn in, simply as a matter of ‘being there’.

Respect, or lack thereof.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Dec 13

Hope is vital.

People need something to believe in … to be a part of … to aspire to.

This is evident with the current Summit meeting on Climate Change in Copenhagen. As with previous meetings, whether focussed on environmental issues as in Kyoto, or international trade as in Seattle for ‘General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’ (GATT).

People want to be a part of something. Especially something ‘Big’.

Interestingly, to me anyway, is that for all the ‘anti-corporate’ emphasis displayed at the globalization meetings for GATT in Seattle, is that the protestors themselves had become a ‘body’ of people organized for a stated purpose – an organized ‘body’ of people is precisely the definition of a corporation that they were so against. This is amusing because people want to be a part of something ‘Big’, as evidenced by their very participation in protest against ‘Big business’.

Yes, I know very well there’s much more involved.

My point is that there is nothing inherently wrong or bad with ‘corporation’ as a concept. In fact so much of the ‘good’ we take for granted is the result of the business of corporations; business has brought us much of our beneficial developments and social progress.

Similarly, there is nothing inherently wrong or bad with ‘business’.

Indeed, it will be through business that we continue to progress as a civilization.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Nov 09

So, we won the right to host the 2015 Pan-Am games.

What did we actually win?

Sure, sports events are fun and there’s the possibility of positive beneficial economic … spin-offs, the ‘multiplier effect’, etc.

There’s also the possibility of further social debt.

In ‘winning’ the bid to host the games, we ‘won’ the obligation to build various sport-specific infrastructure … at a time when, evidently, we can’t afford to effectively maintain the infrastructure we already have.

Is this wise?

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Nov 05

Here’s an excellent book: ‘Getting to Zero Waste‘, by Paul Palmer, PhD.

With his PhD. in chemistry (Yale), Mr. Palmer founded (1973) a chemical recycling (and brokering) business, and is now the Founding President of The Zero Waste Institute.

We have, in this book, a wealth of knowledge and experience gained through Palmer’s professional life. Palmer’s accounts of dealing with the ‘authorities’ will leave you laughing at the nonsense while you share his frustration. Similarly enlightening is his analysis of the ‘garbage industry’ – really, a ‘hauling’ industry.

Imagine chemical dump sites full of rusting, leaking barrels of chemicals that could otherwise have been put to good use.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 26

Consider: Our society (our ’so-called’ advanced, developed western nations) are comprised of at least five (5) distinct generations of people who, after fifteen years of the formal educational system (jr. K – Gr. 12) have learned very little … if anything at all … of nature, ecology, ‘the environment’. And, through no fault of their own.

Is it any wonder that we have problems?

And with post-secondary, only those who pursue bio/eco studies have a real basis of understanding. But, then, in the typically ‘reductionist’ mode that doesn’t provide the basis for understanding the many aspects of emergent properties of dynamical systems – nature; Life; economics; society; climate; weather; and so much else are dynamical systems with emergent properties that cannot necessarily be understood from an a knowledge of their individual component parts.

This does not bode well.

*

This lack of knowledge/understanding is so important since it is the decisions that people make (big and small) everyday that comprise ‘the economy’ and a civilized society.

The economy, in general, is the result of our social interactions. What people ‘busy’ themselves with – all day, everyday … their busy-ness, is, indeed, their ‘business’; and, ’the economy’ is the combination of everyones’ business. All of which is composed of decisions.

And virtually all of those decisions are based on a lack of knowledge/understanding … of the very ecological ‘asset base’ on which everything is absolutely dependent, and, from which everything derives.

Rectifying this situation … this eco–_social disconnect is a priority.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 20

As described in the previous post, the ‘Kitchen (work) Triangle’ is widely known and appreciated as a design ‘tool’: a set of design parameters which establish the basis of highly effective and efficient ‘layout’ of appliances and floorplan.

The length of an (average) person’s stride and reach, forms the anatomical basis from which the ‘distances’ between the utilities (refrigerator, sink and oven) are determined.

This is the field of ‘ergonomics‘.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 18

The design concept of the ‘Kitchen (work) Triangle’ has become well appreciated thanks to the popularity of home renovations and interior design over the past two decades.

The notion of the ‘kitchen triangle’ is entirely a matter of utilitarian functionality, on which the whole design is based: the ‘triangle’ includes the most used utilities …

* refrigerator – cold storage site
* sink – cleaning, preparation site
* oven/stove – cooking work site

This is one of the most common and well understood/accepted examples of ‘ergonomics‘: the study of effective and efficient design, according to human bio-mechanics.

I believe the ‘kitchen (work) triangle’ is an important analogy and model for the design of our communities – we ought to think of a ‘Community Triangle’ of our most important ’sites’: home, groceries, school … etc.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 16

Whereas technology is a physical embodiment of information, technique is a direct application of information (in the form of a service).

For example: a pre-processed food product is a technology, so to speak, while the ability to prepare a meal, ‘just-in-time’ (J.I.T) is a technique.

With the processed food, a frozen prepared dinner, the ‘information’ content is embodied … and takes place in the factory – actually, the ‘high-tech’ technology is behind the scenes.

By comparison, the ‘J.I.T’ preparation of food … the culinary technique is equally ‘high-tech’ in a different way: the knowledge/skills required to prepare and cook a meal is quite sophisticated.

Technique is a form of ‘information technology, and can be very ‘high-tech’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
preload preload preload

Add Comment »
Tweet This
Digg This
Save to Delicious
Stumble This