Mar 11

Emergent patters/properties of complex adaptive systems are achieved through simple operating ‘rules’.

Indeed, simple ‘rules’ are a necessity of complex dynamical interactions. A common misunderstanding is that the complex interactions are a result of complex ‘rules’.

Emergent properties may be thought of as ’simplicities’ in the sense that they are the identifiable ‘things’ … whether properties (structural behaviour), patterns (of birds in flight, schoals of birds), or ‘problems’ … which result from the complex interactions of the dynamical system.

While the interactions of the system are complex, the rules which lead to the system’s behaviour are ’simple’. This is one of many counterintuitive aspects of complex adaptive systems.

‘Life’ provides the best and most obvious example.

Applying the lessons learned from the ‘rules of Life’, to the design of Communities (and resulting social lifestyles) is a high form of Biomimicry. The notion of having a few simple rules by which to design and construct healthy vibrant communities of immense diversity and resilience is confirmed by Life.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Mar 01

Complex Adaptive Systems are also known as Fractal Systems, in regards to their ’scale-independent’ or ‘fractal’ structure.

The fractal characteristic (or scale-independence) of Complex Adaptive Systems is that features of the whole are present in each of the component parts … this is also known as ’self-similarity’ … patterns that repeat at different scales.

Our ‘problems’ are (in certain cases) fractal ‘patterns’ on various scales of our eco/socio-economic system. So, too, solutions can be fractal: an effective re-build of a system structure at one level can/will be a solution on various scales.

Urban Transformation is the practical application of this principle: the improper design of the existing residential subdivisions in a primary component of many integrated multi-scalar (fractal) ‘problems’ … we can transform the existing residential subdivisions into real Communities, by design, with solutions as emergent properties on various scales.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 25

Developing a new understanding is a new mindset … a non-reversible neural systemic change.

Specifically, understanding Urban Transformation … the need for structural re-building of our physical communities, and the practical capabilities to do so … is a systemic change to a new mindset of possibilities.

*

It is by learning a sufficient amount and variety of component ‘pieces’ of information, and their interconnections …. attaining the appropriate ‘critical mass(es)’ of learning, in a critically appropriate (short) period of time … that the systemic change of mindset or ‘understanding’ is achieved.

Likewise, in turn, when a sufficient number and variety of people … the ‘critical mass(es)’ of people … develop a new understanding – and, in a critically short period of time, a new widespread social paradigm can be achieved.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 22

The structure of our residential subdivisions presents enormous potential for beneficial change.

To truly appreciate the potential for achieving systemic change … and, the potential for vast improvements, it is necessary to understand the underlying factors of our existing problematic residential ‘form’. In particular, the roads: the arterial avenues/roads, and, the ‘inner’ residential roads.

I’m focussing on roads as a primary ‘component’ because it represents a defining feature of the landscape – delineating the resultant land area that is ‘left over’ for all other uses; roads are a very high cost feature (initial construction, maintenance and repair); and, as a consequence of ‘form’, virtually all aspects of life both involve and impact roads.

In terms of systems, roads serve as a ‘boundary conditions’.

Yet, the roads are also serve as linear ‘centres’ of commerce and industry.

These are two conflicting functions, and as I believe, the source of much of our social, transportation, traffic congestion ‘problems’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 19

So many of our eco/socio-economic ‘problems’ originate with the poor design of residential subdivisions: the potential of transforming this ’structure’ to real Communities presents the means of achieving systemic change to sustainable societies.

*

This post continues the discussion based on Donella Meadows’ classic publication …           ‘Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System’. Below are a few key quotes.

“The only way to fix a system that is laid out wrong is to rebuild it, if you can.”

“Physical structure is crucial in a system, but rarely a leverage point, because changing it is rarely simple. The leverage point is in proper design in the first place. After the structure is built, the leverage is in understanding it’s limitations and bottlenecks and refraining from fluctuations or expansions that strain it’s capacity.”

While these statements are applicable to all systems, in this case the focus is on the structural form of our residential ‘community’ subdivisions and the problems that result as emergent properties of the complex system of interactions.

In order for us to  appreciate the need for new, properly designed ’structures’, and understand how to achieve the systemic changes, we need a deep understanding of both the lack of proper design of the original system structure (specifically, residential subdivisions) and lack of understanding of it’s limitations which has lead to the currently strained capacities … and, the ‘emergent problems’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 16

Transforming our subdivisions into viable integrated Communities, by design, represents a vital ‘Leverage Point’ for greater systemic non-reversible change to a sustainable society.

***

The physical structure or form of a system is a critical factor in it’s functioning … whether the functioning is effective/efficient, or problematic.

And, problematic is what we currently have … ecological, social and economic.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 15

Communities are a systemic ‘whole’ on a small (local) scale, while also larger-scale ‘component wholes’ … of our greater socio-economic system(s).

It is this ‘duality’ – in a fractal sense – that presents an opportunity of enormous potential.

Communities represent a key ‘leverage point’ …  as a means of establishing large-scale beneficial systemic change.

In fact, this is a uniquely vital ‘Dual Leverage Point’: as an ‘end’ goal of resolving many practical ‘issues’ for local residents (a means of improving their lifestyles); and, on a greater social scale, the improvements of local behavioural interactions serves as a means of establishing large-scale transitional systemic socio-economic changes.

*

*

Our problematic situations are systemic, and many eco/socio-economic ‘issues’ are a result of the form of our existing residential subdivisions.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 10

Systemic non-reversible solutions are needed to ‘resolve’ our problematic situations.

A real resolution of our problematic situation(s) implies ‘change’ … a transitional change … and, permanent change: In systems science, this is referred to as a ‘non-reversible’ systemic change.

After all, it’d do no good to change ‘for the better’, only for the system to revert back to the same (or similar) problematic situation.

This is a true transformation – transforming the ‘whole’ system to achieve a ‘non-reversible’ resolution to the problematic situation(s).

Understanding systems and requires great effort to learn: there are various types of systems, each with many ‘aspects’ or component parts, and interconnections; there is the issue of ’scale’ and ’scope’ (scale of breadth and depth).

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 09

Complex Adaptive Systems involve a multitude of interactions/interconnections among numerous component parts in which ‘control’ is highly decentralized, and the coherent behaviour (patterns) arising from the interactions (competitive, cooperative) between the ‘agents’, which are capable of changing and ‘learning’ – adaptive.

Both ecological and social systems are complex adaptive systems, and even more so together in a greater eco/soci-economic system: we are dependent on ecological systems for our lives (air, water, nutrients, etc.), and, our actions in turn affect ecosystems. Furthermore, our socio-economic systems depend entirely on the inputs of ecological resources as ‘factors’ of productions (and ’sinks’ for our waste by-products).

Moreover, the problematic eco/socio-economic situations are complex adaptive systems.

So, if we’re to truly resolve our eco/social ‘problems’ we can do so only with a systems mindset – by resolving the complex adaptive system ‘as a whole’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 03

From a distance, a community would have a ‘dimensional’ look to it – similar to a city with it’s downtown core.

So, there’d be a sense of Place, both from afar and within. The community core would be visually evident and obvious, so that with a glance from a distance even a visitor could easily/immediately locate the centre.

A self-contained community, then, can be thought of as a fractal structure – in which, the features of the whole are represented in each of the various scaled components. Community; district; city; region … are (ought to be) representative ‘wholes’ of increasing scale. This will be a topic of further discussion in a following article.

This ’self-similarity’ or, ’scale-independence’ is a fundamental aspect of dynamical, complex adaptive systems … a (successful) feature of nature; a replicable model … so, why then aren’t we adopting/adapting natures successes?! This is an aspect of Biomimicry that deserves serious attention.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Feb 01

Complex Systems involve a multiplicity of components and connections.

A vibrant Community, being a complex system, is comprised of a multiplicity (amount and variety) of components and connections.

In the previous blog articles, ‘Systems Approach to Solutions’ (Parts 1 & 2), I briefly described the nature of systems, especially complex systems, and the ’systems approach’ to designing meaningful solutions.

Our ecological and socio-economic ‘issues’ are truly complex, involving many interconnected component aspects.

In the subdivisions of our urban/suburban societies, our lifestyle behaviours represent a primary component of our problematic situation(s): our auto-dependent … highly mobile, yet also highly sedentary lifestyles and excessive processed food result in many health ‘issues’; energy-intensity (electricity; petro; etc.) causes ecological/economic impacts; and on …

Our lifestyles, though, are ‘pre-determined’ in the sense that we’re constrained by the physical form of the built-environment in which we live … so many (most) of us live in subdivisions (inner suburban sprawl of a previous generation; new suburbs); and, the suburbs are so similar.

So, residential subdivisions as a physical ‘form’ are a major component of our problematic situations, imposing major negative ecological, social and economic impacts.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 28

A community system, specifically a complex adaptive system is comprised of a multitude of components and (inter)connections.

So a real community – as a complex adaptive system – requires the necessary critical mass of components and connections.

Actually, we could think in terms of the main ‘component’ sub-systems: physical infrastructural system; social system; and, the greater ecological/environmental system.

Scale and scope … of the subsystems and their components and connections. In fact, scale and scope of each of the ’scales’ and ’scopes’.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 26

Consider, from a ’systems mindset’, that our problematic situations are systemic: a consequent result of the various components and their interactions that comprise the ‘whole’ system.

Without a sufficient understanding (in breadth and depth) of the system as a whole, we cannot alter or change any ‘one’ component and expect a drastic beneficial result … even a drastic change to a single component will not necessarily fundamentally alter the whole … it may, but not necessarily; even changes to two or more components, individually or independently, is likely insufficient to achieve fundamental system change.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 25

A sustainable resilient society is essential.

To achieve this sustainability, our many ecological/environmental and social ‘issues’ must be resolved.

Our eco/social ‘issues’ are interconnected and interdependent … this is the realm of complex, dynamic systems: resultant ‘wholes’ comprised of a variety of component ‘parts’ which have a variety of interconnections/interdependence.

So, our eco/social ‘issues’ must be understood as a ‘whole’.

To achieve a lasting beneficial change toward a sustainable resilient society, requires a ’systemic change’ … specifically, a ‘non-reversible’ systemic transitional change. For systemic change, the system ‘as a  whole’ must be addressed.

A ’systems approach’ … with a ’systems mindset’ … is a prerequisite to truly resolving our problematic situations.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 21

Understanding the existing ‘lack’ of design is necessary to design true Communities.

To the extent that physical form of modern subdivisions are (or, can be said to be) ‘designed’, it is really only the linear aspect of the roads in the planar realm – the linear geometric shapes of the flat ground level roads, as seen from above.

Foolishness! A geometrical layout as observed from where no-one sees! A ‘visual’ design that has no beneficial effect … in fact, these silly layouts may well have detrimental impacts on daily living.

Furthermore, subdivisions (even the ‘mature’ subdivisions of a previous generation) lack the balance and diversity of commerce, industry and arts/culture/etc. to be true communities.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 19

Visualize … Community designed for People!

Designing for people includes pedestrian scale, so that everyone lives within a reasonable walk from the Community Core: the standard being, the rate of walking travel of the slowest persons – young toddlers; elderly and physically challenged.

What is an appropriate geographical size?

What would such a Community look like?

And designing for ‘people’ includes those who are visually impaired or blind. In which case, what would such a Community ‘feel’ like or be ’sensed’ by these people (whether residents or visitors)?

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Jan 08

Our shared needs are a result of the ‘built form’ of our cities/towns/neighbourhoods … so, our ultimate shared need is to change the ‘built form’ … to transform.

Some examples of shared problematic situations and their corresponding goals, include:

* traffic congestion … goal: to reduce auto dependency, use; improve traffic flow
* local provision of basics (food) … need to promote/support local merchants
* pedestrian access and infrastructure … need more pedestrian ‘ways’
*
* excessive impermeable surfaces (asphalt, concrete) … need more green/natural/open space
* disconnected parks … need to connect into network
* lack of biodiversity … need to increase natural spaces and indigenous species
*
* health (obesity, etc.) … need to increase physical activity in ‘daily living’ (walking, etc.)
* intergenerational interaction … need places/spaces for all people to frequent

This list could grow very long, as there are many more issues/ and they are very real needs: ecological, social, personal. And affect people in various ways, directly and indirectly.

No one ‘issue’ may seem overly significant … but it’s the totality over the course of each and every day, of the various ‘component needs’, and combinations of these ‘needs’ that adds up to effect our individual lives and the health/well-being of our relationships and society as a whole.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Dec 15

We need viable business and financing models to create an industry of Urban Transformation.

The Eighth annual EcoCity World Summit (2009) is finishing up it’s two-day conference in Istanbul today.

Interestingly, this year’s meeting coincides with the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. For all the attention focussed on the Copenhagen conference, it is ‘cities’ – particularly their ‘re-development’ that holds the greatest possibilities and potential for resolving our ecological/climate issues … and improving the lives (lifestyles) of people.

We need to transform our personal lifestyles and society to be ecologically sustainable – and resilient (to endure ecological and economic ’shocks’). The ‘built-form’ of our communities/cities determines, to a great extent, our lifestyles/society: so, we can improve our individual/collective lives by improving the form of our communities/cities.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Dec 08

War is commonly thought to be an economic stimulus.

For America enduring the Great Depression of the 1930s, World War 2 seemingly provided the stimulus to revitalize the economy. In fact, it did. For those who lived through the depression, the military-industrial stimulus may well have lived on as a ‘meme‘ – the idea borne in mind of the positive socio-economic aspects of the wartime economic activity. This ‘meme’ has lived on in the culture.

Through history, military activity – whether purely defensive precautions, or outwardly hostile aggressions – has provided the social ‘basis’ for technical innovation and progress.

Now, war, military activity and the modern military-industrial complex serve as models for a new form of economic stimulus.

Urban Transformation stands to be the next major industrial complex (system), with the potential for massive economic stimulus … and social progress.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Dec 01

We can and do re-build cities after they’ve been destroyed by war.

So, let’s re-build cities … minus the war!

Let’s just forego the ‘fighting part’ and proceed straight to the re-building!

Makes sense, doesn’t it?

*

*

Consider the destruction of buildings and ‘infrastructure’ (roads, etc.) through military conflict.

Consider the difficulty of re-building when the roads are impassable … full of debris (bricks, concrete, twisted metal, etc.); even the roads may be ruined and must be re-built before reconstructing buildings. Think of the European cities in the aftermath of WW2. Or anywhere else, for that matter, following military conflict.

Yet, we re-build.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Nov 16

Imagine, Urban Agriculture as a new industry in which people work locally.

Imagine, the work processes designed around the use of simple hand-tools, primarily, which the workers can conveniently carry themselves in a backpack to accomplish many/most of the tasks – shoveling, raking, pruning, staking, weeding, etc … etc.

Imagine cycling as the primary mode of transportation for the distributed workers. This is symbolic of a new era.

With only a small, lightweight complement of hand-tools … the ‘fieldworkers’ can actually utilize a bicycle as a primary vehicle within their ‘fieldwork catchment area’ in the vicinity of their home.

Since employees primarily work within the immediate vicinity of their homes, and require only a small complement of lightweight hand tools … then, bicycles are the appropriate practical vehicle for employee mobilization.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Nov 04

There is considerable ‘talk’ lately about the increase of ‘climate change denial’.

A recent US poll shows a decrease in those believing ‘there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising’, and fewer people see global warming as a very serious problem.

This (Nov. , 09) article by George Monbiot describes the situation and elaborates with a hypothesis about how the ‘fear of death’ (and desire for immortality) leads to ‘perverse’ actions that increase the risk of death – in this case, denial of a potentially dangerous situation.

Anyway, whether or not ‘climate change’ is real … and whether or not it is ‘human activity induced’, I believe we can go a long way to resolving our many problematic eco/social ‘issues’ as a direct consequence of

It is important to keep in mind that whatever effect we have on climate, or more broadly on ‘the environment’, is through our actions, behaviours, lifestyles.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 30

Continuing the discussion begun with ‘Sidewalks’ (Oct. 29), here’s another example of how our vocabulary determines our communication and understanding of issues.

Road ‘frontage’ further serves to promote the road as being primary … as with the seconday ’sidewalks’, which keep people as pedestrians ‘over to the side’. With ‘road frontage’, the house itself is situated in relation to the road, and the front of the house faces the road …

In this way, the road has become a primary feature of neighbourhoods, communities, cities … our lives.Likewise, automobile use has become a primary feature of our behaviours/habits … and lifestyles.

Unintended, most likely. Still, an important issue to understand.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 29

The value of a word.

Considered this: The very word, ’sidewalk’, establishes the road and it’s motor vehicles as ‘primary’; thus, the sidewalk, and walking/pedestrians are always ’secondary’.

After all, the sidewalk is ‘at the side’ of what is most important … the road (presumably for motor vehicles). This is fine for arterial ‘avenues’, where long distance (and ‘high’ speed transportation) is the goal.

In residential areas/ communities, however, if sidewalks are secondary then walking is a secondary activity.

The issue, here, is in residential communities: ’sidewalks’ imply walking as a secondary activity. The de-valueing of an activity is implicit, perhaps even unintended, but effective nonetheless.

Imagine the different attitudes/beliefs/behaviour … the new habits and lifestyles … that could result from a design paradigm of ‘walk-ways’ as primary mobility infrastructure in communities, with ’sideroads’ off to the side.

Simply changing the words we use to describe the situation … the format or layout … of our ‘built environment’, changes how we think about and visualize.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
Oct 26

Consider: Our society (our ’so-called’ advanced, developed western nations) are comprised of at least five (5) distinct generations of people who, after fifteen years of the formal educational system (jr. K – Gr. 12) have learned very little … if anything at all … of nature, ecology, ‘the environment’. And, through no fault of their own.

Is it any wonder that we have problems?

And with post-secondary, only those who pursue bio/eco studies have a real basis of understanding. But, then, in the typically ‘reductionist’ mode that doesn’t provide the basis for understanding the many aspects of emergent properties of dynamical systems – nature; Life; economics; society; climate; weather; and so much else are dynamical systems with emergent properties that cannot necessarily be understood from an a knowledge of their individual component parts.

This does not bode well.

*

This lack of knowledge/understanding is so important since it is the decisions that people make (big and small) everyday that comprise ‘the economy’ and a civilized society.

The economy, in general, is the result of our social interactions. What people ‘busy’ themselves with – all day, everyday … their busy-ness, is, indeed, their ‘business’; and, ’the economy’ is the combination of everyones’ business. All of which is composed of decisions.

And virtually all of those decisions are based on a lack of knowledge/understanding … of the very ecological ‘asset base’ on which everything is absolutely dependent, and, from which everything derives.

Rectifying this situation … this eco–_social disconnect is a priority.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
preload preload preload

Add Comments »
Tweet This
Digg This
Save to Delicious
Stumble This